From: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:17:20 -0800
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:32:19 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>> Sorry for not remembering the suggestion:( >> >> In the previous versions of this change I used a global flag per whole >> page_pool, just like XSk does for the whole XSk buff pool, then you >> proposed to use the lowest bit of ::dma_addr and store it per page, so >> that it would be more granular/precise. I tested it and it doesn't >> perform worse than global, but in some cases may be beneficial. > > FWIW I'd vote to stick to per-page pool. You seem to handle the > sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(long) case correctly but the code is > growing in complexity, providing no known/measurable benefit. > We can always do this later but for now it seems like a premature > optimization to me. Yeah, this also seems more logical and optimal to me. Will wait a bit for a possible reply from Chris and then send the next rev. Thanks, Olek _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
