On 6/23/2025 5:29 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> This is the remaining 8 patches from the previous submission. I've rebased
> them on top of what Jakub pulled and deleted the control-flow macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]>
> ---
> Jacob Keller (3):
>       ice: clear time_sync_en field for E825-C during reprogramming
>       ice: read TSPLL registers again before reporting status
>       ice: default to TIME_REF instead of TXCO on E825-C
> 
> Karol Kolacinski (5):
>       ice: use bitfields instead of unions for CGU regs
>       ice: add multiple TSPLL helpers
>       ice: wait before enabling TSPLL
>       ice: fall back to TCXO on TSPLL lock fail
>       ice: move TSPLL init calls to ice_ptp.c
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.h | 212 +++-----------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c |   2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c    |  11 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c |  22 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tspll.c  | 425 
> ++++++++++++++++++----------
>  5 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 357 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 96c16c59b705d02c29f6bef54858b5da78c3fb13
> change-id: 20250417-kk-tspll-improvements-alignment-2cb078adf96
> 
> Best regards,

Tony found a couple of nits in the earlier patches. My attempt at
mechanically removing the _OR_DIE macros ended up with a couple patches
inserting and then a later patch converting them back to the non-macro
form. I think he's working on fixing those and the ones applied will
have this issue resolved. Shows what I get for not doing patch-by-patch
testing and assuming I'd get merge conflicts for all of them...

Reply via email to