Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 11:58:31PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:05:57 -0500 Daniel Zahka wrote:
>> On 11/9/25 5:39 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Daniel, I asked twice if this could be a non-driver param. Jakub asked
>> > for clearer definition of this know in that context.
>> >
>> > Not sure why you are ignoring this :/
>> >  
>> 
>> My apologies. I think there was a miscommunication. I assumed Jakub's 
>> question was directed towards you. I have no objection to making it a 
>> generic param; I will do so in v4. It sounded to me like Jakub was 
>> wanting more information on what exactly this setting does beyond what I 
>> was able to provide in the commit message and mlx5 devlink 
>> documentation. My understanding is that this setting pertains to tx 
>> csums and how the device expects the driver to prepare partial csums 
>> when doing tx cso. I don't really know more than that. Especially not 
>> something like what the FW's role in implementing this is.
>
>Right, per To: field of my email I as asking Jiri for clarifications.
>
>Since we struggle to understand the semantics nack on making this
>generic. Chances are whoever reuses the "generic" param will have a
>different interpretation of its meaning, so what's the point of making
>it generic.

Okay, I don't mind that much.

Reply via email to