> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Larysa Zaremba > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2025 5:49 AM > To: [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L > <[email protected]> > Cc: Lobakin, Aleksander <[email protected]>; Samudrala, Sridhar > <[email protected]>; Singhai, Anjali <[email protected]>; > Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]>; Zaremba, Larysa > <[email protected]>; Fijalkowski, Maciej > <[email protected]>; Tantilov, Emil S <[email protected]>; > Chittim, Madhu <[email protected]>; Hay, Joshua A > <[email protected]>; Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]>; > Shanmugam, Jayaprakash <[email protected]>; > Wochtman, Natalia <[email protected]>; Jiri Pirko > <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>; Eric Dumazet > <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; Paolo Abeni > <[email protected]>; Simon Horman <[email protected]>; Jonathan > Corbet <[email protected]>; Richard Cochran <[email protected]>; > Kitszel, Przemyslaw <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 08/15] idpf: refactor idpf to > use > libie_pci APIs > > From: Pavan Kumar Linga <[email protected]> > > Use libie_pci init and MMIO APIs where possible, struct idpf_hw cannot be > deleted for now as it also houses control queues that will be refactored > later. > Use libie_cp header for libie_ctlq_ctx that contains mmio info from the start > in > order to not increase the diff later. > > Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <[email protected]> > Co-developed-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]> > --- > 2.47.0
Tested-by: Samuel Salin <[email protected]>
