> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf Of R, > Bharath > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 11:13 PM > To: Zaremba, Larysa <[email protected]>; intel-wired- > [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L <[email protected]> > Cc: Lobakin, Aleksander <[email protected]>; Samudrala, Sridhar > <[email protected]>; Singhai, Anjali <[email protected]>; > Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]>; Zaremba, Larysa > <[email protected]>; Fijalkowski, Maciej > <[email protected]>; Tantilov, Emil S <[email protected]>; > Chittim, Madhu <[email protected]>; Hay, Joshua A > <[email protected]>; Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]>; > Shanmugam, Jayaprakash <[email protected]>; > Wochtman, Natalia <[email protected]>; Jiri Pirko > <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>; Eric Dumazet > <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; Paolo Abeni > <[email protected]>; Simon Horman <[email protected]>; Jonathan > Corbet <[email protected]>; Richard Cochran <[email protected]>; > Kitszel, Przemyslaw <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected]; Burra, Phani R > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 06/15] libie: add > bookkeeping support for control queue messages > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-wired-lan <[email protected]> On Behalf > > Of Larysa Zaremba > > Sent: 17 November 2025 19:19 > > To: [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: Lobakin, Aleksander <[email protected]>; Samudrala, > > Sridhar <[email protected]>; Singhai, Anjali > > <[email protected]>; Michal Swiatkowski > > <[email protected]>; Zaremba, Larysa > > <[email protected]>; Fijalkowski, Maciej > > <[email protected]>; Tantilov, Emil S > > <[email protected]>; Chittim, Madhu <[email protected]>; > > Hay, Joshua A <[email protected]>; Keller, Jacob E > > <[email protected]>; Shanmugam, Jayaprakash > > <[email protected]>; > > Wochtman, Natalia <[email protected]>; Jiri Pirko > > <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>; Eric > > Dumazet <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; > Paolo > > Abeni <[email protected]>; Simon Horman <[email protected]>; > Jonathan > > Corbet <[email protected]>; Richard Cochran <[email protected]>; > > Kitszel, Przemyslaw <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Burra, Phani R > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 06/15] libie: add > > bookkeeping support for control queue messages > > > > From: Phani R Burra <[email protected]> > > > > All send control queue messages are allocated/freed in libie itself > > and tracked with the unique transaction (Xn) ids until they receive response > or time out. > > Responses can be received out of order, therefore transactions are > > stored in an array and tracked though a bitmap. > > > > Pre-allocated DMA memory is used where possible. It reduces the driver > > overhead in handling memory allocation/free and message timeouts. > > > > Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Phani R Burra <[email protected]> > > Co-developed-by: Victor Raj <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Victor Raj <[email protected]> > > Co-developed-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <[email protected]> > > Co-developed-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/libie/controlq.c | 579 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/intel/libie/controlq.h | 172 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 751 insertions(+) > > > > Tested-by: Bharath R <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Samuel Salin <[email protected]>
