I had 32 vs maybe 10 and it was around 10-15 still which is SOMEWHAT playable I suppose...
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Adrienspawn <[email protected]> wrote: > That's not gonna happen in a 50 vs 50 for anything with a GMA950. > > On Mar 3, 1:17 pm, JuiCe <[email protected]> wrote: >> FPS in SC2 is extremely important! Try microing your lings with 5 fps >> in a 50 vs 50 food battle. Good Luck >> >> On 3 Mar, 07:42, Adrienspawn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Plays fine on medium/high on my other desktop >> > 2.4ghz Core 2 + HD2600. >> >> > Actually I tried it again with an AI, on my little 0.8ghz+GMA950, and >> > was able to play a game and win it. Framerate is horrible, around 5-11 >> > still, but for Starcraft 2 it's much much more tolerable then for a >> > shooter. FPS isnt that important here. >> >> > I imagine a single real core (not atom) at 1.6ghz should be enough so >> > long as everything is optimized. I feel like if I could overclock to >> > around 1.4ghz, I'd be able to get 20fps on low settings. >> > On Mar 2, 10:47 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > Did you check that your motherboard is compatible with it? >> >> > > THEfog >> >> > > On 03/03/2010 11:48 AM, "Espionage724" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > :p I just ordered a 2.0 core duo from amazon just now for $15 :D lets >> > > see if SC2 lags then lol... >> >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:27 AM, THEfog . <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > Sounds like your CPU r... >> >> > > -- >> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > -- >> >> > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
