Oh trust me, I'm not saying that intels GPU solutions are good, quite the opposite infact. But I'm not lying when i say that Nvidia Rule the GPU market, the reason that ATI(Aka AMD) has gotten a little headway lately is due to the fact that nvidia have been holding off until Fermi is completed and polished, I've had ATI cards before and the caused me nothing but trouble (on three completely different setups too) and also most of my mates swapped over from ATI years ago (one swapped his 5950 HD or whatever for a Geforce 295GTX). I don't have anything against AMD cause otherwise intel wouldn't have any competition in the market and they would get slack with their CPU's like they did with their GPU's. And just because ATI had DX11 support before any one else dosn't mean there was ANYTHING apart from tech demos that utilized it, and Then by the time it was starting to be used nvidia had it, it reminds me of when your driving and the guy in the lane beside you speeds up to a insane speed just to get 2 cars ahead and then can't go any further, So he might as well just of stayed in his spot. Kinda pointless if you ask me.
THEfog On 23/04/2010 9:35 PM, "Hero" <[email protected]> wrote: Intel makes bad gpus, and they should feel bad. I stick with AMD not just as a fanboy, but someone who believes a good processor provider should make a half decent gpu http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4501857&CatId=3670 This will get the job done on max settings. -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gam... -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
