hmmmmm..u know u could just use "k-lite codec" and it'll have everything you want!! i can watch 720p fine :S same goes for most video extensions (AVI, MPEG, RMVB...etc) the only problem i have with my laptop is if i put FULL sound volume i start getting 100% CPU usage...and everything starts hanging...other than that, all is well fine, same goes for 1080p ...just give K-lite a shot :) if it doesn't solve the problem then i don't know...
Windows 7 T2300E 1.67GHz 3GBRam On Jun 10, 6:01 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > I partially agree with you that xp is a bit better for games, and uses > slightly less resources, period. It never ceases to amuse me how > people whine that vista and 7 use more resources, specially more ram. > Of course it uses more ram, at least if you have 2 or more gb of ram > they don't just sit there, theyre being cached so windows gets more > responsive. I've seen a screenshot of the task manager of server 2008 > r2 that on idle was using 92gb of ram, and you think it was slow > because of that? :) > > Vista was always a finnicky business to discuss, after all it was a > spanking new OS, and no one can deny that from vista onward bsod's > just began diminishing a lot when compared to decaying xp, but with > sp1 it recovered from the awful state vista was when rtm, and sp2 > kinda made it a somewhat stable package, but perhaps it was a little > too late as 7 was already knocking on doors. Even though 7 did manage > to right many wrongs of vista, there were small things that I just > couldn't forgive, like the oh so useful explorer status bar, the > extermination of classic start menu, among other bits and pieces. > Which reminds me, and I usually don't go and recommend software, but > this thing is great, the true comeback of the classic menu, well you > got to see it, give it a try and let me know what you think. > > You can find it here:http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/index.html > > On Jun 10, 10:30 am, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would take xp over vista anyday, but I would also take 7 over xp anyday, > > vista sucks a lot harder than xp. > > > THEfog > > > On 10/06/2010 6:44 PM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Perhaps it borders the irrational, and yes I'm aware of the numbering, > > but maybe its because I prefer the performance and stability of a > > windows 2000/2003/2008 than their counterparts. They're based on the > > same kernel, just upside down :) > > > On Jun 10, 9:30 am, Oscar Lundqvist <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's funny that you say that yo... > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
