The main thing I see about nfs world is if they want to put it running (note I/they said running, not slugging about) on netbooks when it reaches final version, then it will surely perform acceptably, even if at minimum settings. And yes I know netbooks have come quite some way from the measly 1st gen asus eee, but even so they are still netbooks.
On Jun 14, 9:40 am, DragonriderX <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh and yes CPU schedualling is automatically set to programs but i > keep changing it every now and then when background programs are > priority. Too bad laptops can't get CPU upgrades unless you want to > melt that little thing ^.=.^ > > On Jun 13, 4:14 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You really went all out didn't you lol. Good work by the way. Isn't CPU > > scheduling automatically set to programs instead of background? If you had a > > better cpu I could see you getting playable on medium. > > > THEfog > > > On 13/06/2010 5:59 PM, "DragonriderX" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Special Notes: > > Disabled All Unessential Programs and Services using both Game Booster > > and Vista Services Optimiser as well as manually closing applications > > using task manager (such as smoothview, itunes helper, sidebar and > > explorer) > > > Has a 4GB SD Card and a 4GB USB Dedicated for ReadyBoost > > The system’s virtual memory / page file is manually set from 3964MB > > (system Managed) to 5946MB and processor scheduling has been set for > > programs > > > Has The latest drivers by intel which was modded by RAVELV15 which was > > optimised for systems with 4GB RAM (apparently and it works well > > because of it) Edited lines are (when compared to sigma 3.0) the > > OpenGL section, MBM Specific Sections, NonEDIDMode_AddSwSettings > > (noteful is the %REG_DWORD%, 2048), eDPNoFLT_AddSwSettings, interlaced > > removal is set to off, and many more, The most worthy of notice is the > > iCNT0.GeneralConfigData it states maximum device memory configuration > > to 2560 as opposed to Sigmas 512 or 768. If you want I can upload both > > the inf files for you guys to compare > > > I have manually edited my registry for extra performance, the settings > > I touched where Display1_DisableAsyncFlips with value 1, > > Display1_DisableCloneAsyncFlips value 1, > > Display1_PipeOptimisationEnable value 1, IncreaseFixedSegment value 1, > > DisablePFonDP value 1 on both 0000 and 0001 though there could be more > > that I edited, if you want I can make a copy of my registry from that > > section only > > Used setFSB to increase my FSB from the original 144/200/70/30 to > > 146.6/220/75.3/37.7 which increased my FPS by about 2-3 > > > My RAM is not the ones that had originally came with the laptop, I got > > faster ones for the fun of it (800MH/z instead of 667) > > > Game Settings > > 800x600 Resolution running on minimum settings (as opposed to low that > > it defaulted to) > > > Now my laptop’s specifications > > CPU: Intel Celeron 2.16GH/z Single Core > > RAM: Kingston KVR800D2S6 4GB DDR2 800 (apparently running at 667) > > GPU: Either the intel series 3 or series 4, I’ll check properly later, > > but it’s definatly not an nvidia nor an ati else my laptop would be > > playing crysis right now > > > On Jun 13, 12:46 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I really find that hard to believe... > > > and 4500 have between15 to 30fps, so I'm curious about what laptop > > > is that. > > > > On Jun 13, 5:24 am, DragonriderX <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > serious... > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
