lol, yeah, 51xx cant run dx11 i know, coz their are juz a renamed 4 series... what im saying is, although the crytek developers that it will be available to consoles. im not sure if they will provide the same downgradeness on PC as in consoles version...and yeah, i pretty much hoping can play it high with my ATI HD 4670... and DX11 are pretty much the most advance graphics breakthrough since DX10 crysis game...still, with GPU now still expensive (ATI HD 5870, GTX 495) some of us may wait for a couple of years to experience it...like me for example...also, i doubt that most mainstream games will push graphics tech in the near future as consoles are most likely stay the same (PS3 , Xbox 360) for a couple of years...
some of the crytek engine 3 features that i look forward to is automatic optimization according hardware spec to provide smooth gameplay on most system, that also enable it to run on consoles which means the engine itself are self adapted.. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:34 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > It cracks me up when they claim x game (in crysis league) will run > with the same graphics as the pc, only with a more aggresive lod. PC > is the ultimate dominating cracking ruling over all master of graphics > of all time and age :) Yeah, maybe when ps5 and xbox 1440 support > dx10.1 and the multiplatform bs virus is well spread throughout > computers then all our dx15 and opengl 9.0 will have to use only a > fraction of the hardware potential because of console users. > Hum, this might sound like I'm against consoles... I'm more against > multiplatform, if it began earlier we might never have had a gran > turismo, a forza, god of war, and other great games that are exclusive > to systems, not to mention diablo, starcraft, warcraft, etc etc etc. > In essence each system has their strong genres, though some are cross > platform, others are just wrong, like rts and fps on a gamepad > (grrr...killzone...) or a beat em up on a keyboard. > > My point is that even though it is good that new games run acceptably > on still recent hardware, it is great that we have software pushing > the hardware envelope, specially when there is tweaking potential for > those without the raw power of new medium to high end hardware. > > On Jun 21, 2:38 am, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > Although yes it will be a relief to gamers that they no longer need a > > futuristic super computer to play the latest installment of crysis, the > > original crysis really made the graphics industry pull up its socks in a > > attempt to beat competition in creating a card which could run this game > as > > it was intended, a stimuli of sorts. > > > > THEfog > > > > On 21/06/2010 11:27 AM, "hussam aulaian" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > @angelic : According to notebookcheck.com , 4650-4670 are 2 of the top > > second class laptop GPUs > > they even beated 5145-5165 , so i disagree with u , even if crysis 2 will > > require DX11 4650 will be able to run it at medium settigns > > with 25-35 FPS at least , cuz the game "Just Cause 2" requires DX11 , > and i > > installed and tried running it at the max settings > > and i got 18-25 FPS on the 4650 > > > > and ATI 5145-5165 they dont support DX11 , so wht u say is not applicable > > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
