Only thing that sucks so far is that I can't use normal means of
activating my windows 7....

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Really? Would HP know I OC'd? I mean right now my laptop still works
> fine and passed RAM/HDD Tests as well.
>
> And about EFI, I installed Windows 7 in EFI mode. Heres what I had to do.
> - Set BIOS to use UEFI
> - Go to startup list and boot an EFI file (in this case, it was
> EFI\Boot\bootmrgx64.efi or something like that on the win7 ult x64
> dvd)
> - Install 7 normally for the most part (in order to use EFI booting, I
> have to have a partition called HP_TOOLS in fat32. Nothing has to be
> on it though, but it has to exist. I had to make my drive also GPT
> prior to doing this from Ubuntu's Gparted. While creating partitions,
> I had the normal system reserved partition, and a different partition
> that was MSR reserved (EFI partition). Then I had my main partition
> and my hp tools)
> My windows 7 doesn't have the fancy boot screen anymore (it reverts
> back to vista style with the bar) but I only see the loading screen
> for maybe 3 seconds before it boots into windows, whereas if I was
> using BIOS mode, it would take 30secs or more to go from the boot
> screen to windows.
>
> Also I wanted to test out XP because I just assumed I might get
> slightly better performance (not that it's bad in 7). In the end, I
> just said forget it and then went back to 7. If I kept AHCI enabled
> without proper drivers on install of XP, it would BSOD and restart
> instantly. If I enabled AHCI after installing XP in IDE mode, it would
> BSOD and restart as well.
>
> And isn't AHCI better then using IDE mode? My stuff still works fine
> in AHCI mode from what I noticed anyway, and plus there was some
> reason why it was better to use that over IDE, something that allowed
> more commands or something i forget what it was called.
>
>
> And some more about EFI. It's the thing that mac's use to boot OS X.
> It's better then BIOS (for some reason that idk how to explain)
> though. There are some OEM's that also use EFI as a total replacement
> of the BIOS as well. The advantage of this is, a way nicer looking
> BIOS-like interface. For instance, in my bios, I can use my mouse
> (which is amazing for not even booting fully), and it actually has a
> GUI instead of a blue screen with words and stuff. Also this makes
> dual booting easier as well, and it might even make hackintosh OS X
> installations go easier. But so far, using Windows 7 in UEFI mode
> doesn't seem to have THAT much of a performance difference inside the
> OS itself. It does make the boot faster though by far.
>
> Also I heard I could boot EFI applications like QuickLook (aparantly,
> if I read correctly, I can read my email before I even boot an OS)
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:44 AM, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> wrote:
>> yeah , and one more thing can i add to ur page , that bluescreen
>> troubleshooter software ,, its free ,incase if u dont mine here is the link
>> again
>> http://cid-b0ec9a9e9e20660f.office.live.com/self.aspx/Software/bluescreenview%5E_setup.rar
>>
>> --
>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>



-- 
Espionage724 Has A Signature...

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to