6gb RAM is kinda too much for me, only rich kid who brags buy 8gb rams or more.. 4 gb RAM is more than enough for gaming, even 2gb can serve main stream gaming pretty well... a couple of years from now, gaming industry are more focusing on consoles, so IMO, there will be more consoles port such as prototype and etc, those port will not require more than 2gb RAM to run..only CPU and GPU that matters...it's a waste of money to buy more than 4gb RAM if ur not doing heavy video editing and stuffs...even waste to buy it juz for brags..
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:07 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Right now I have 2x1GB, I wanted to get a 2x2GB kit but they are quite > expensive, and I have the concern of just buying one module of 2GB and > it not being fully stable or the board not maintaining dual channel > for some reason. > The only computers that truly require x64 OSes are those with 6GB of > minimum ram. > > On Jun 26, 8:02 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > same with me... > > PC manufaturer nowadays are tightly bound to software company...micro$oft > > makes x64 OSes dominant, so will others follow including all hardware > > manufacturers and bla3x.. > > unless x64 have fix on most of the issues, i probably wont change to x64 > > even if i upgrade my RAM soon, 2x2GB..3gb of usable RAM, 4gb with > PAE..still > > enough for me ^^ > > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 2:58 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > True, there have been bugs since 2005 with x64 OSes, but when it > > > becomes a minimum requirement, it begins to worry me. > > > > > On Jun 26, 7:29 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > i have one but im sticking with 32 bit win7 ^^ > > > > apart of im only having 2gb RAM in my desktop, 64 bit is still too > buggy > > > for > > > > me, even some drivers are buggy in x64...heck some ATI Catalyst > driver > > > have > > > > openGL issue with x64...lol... > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:10 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Must be good to have a x64 cpu... > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 5:08 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > My server computer and laptop have x64 :D > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Don't even kid about it. It's already bad enough that server > > > versions > > > > > > > don't work with 32bit :(( > > > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 12:22 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> and i imagine future windows 8 will be 64bit minimum and non > > > embedded > > > > > > >> one is 128bit supported...lol, world is changing fast.. > > > > > > > > >> On Jun 25, 9:08 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > Yes, that xp you saw was an embedded version of an embedded > xp > > > :) > > > > > > >> > hence the 16bits. Windows 7 is 32 bits minimum, and it's big > > > brother > > > > > > >> > is only 64 bits, which also happens to have an embedded > version. > > > > > > > > >> > On Jun 25, 2:03 pm, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > um i remember seeing that info on an xp installed in > cashier > > > so im > > > > > not wrong > > > > > > >> > > , > > > > > > >> > > well wht im wrong abt that win7 is not , it a 32and64 > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
