http://www.guru3d.com/article/phenom-ii-x6-1055t-1090t-review/14

as you can see, the Phenom X6 1055t is on par or even better than some
of the core i7s and all the core i5s. That's pretty damn good

On Aug 5, 1:54 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually only some atoms have ht, as well as some pentiums 4, not all
> prescotts have ht though.
> About the point of making single cores, price would fit the bill.
>
> Forget single cores, start forgetting dual cores, NEVER think of three
> cores, quad cores is a good bet, six cores is futureproofing, and who
> knows what might be coming to the domestic market...
>
> On Aug 5, 1:15 pm, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Think so, and so do the Pentium 4 Prescotts.
>
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:12 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > hmm, correct me if im wrong, doesnt the Atom it self are single core but
> > > with HT enabled? and theoretically have 2 threads available..
>
> > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Namige <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> So there would be no reason for manufacturers to design anymore single
> > >> core chips spart from the atom
>
> > >> On Aug 5, 7:49 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > Single core gaming ended with previous generation call of duty games,
> > >> > and the likes. All games are optimized for at least 2 physical
> > >> > threads.
>
> > >> > On Aug 5, 7:13 am, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > The first sentance corrected:
>
> > >> > > Well, the fact is, even with a single core K8 CPU, the HP DV2 (with a
> > >> > > HD3410) still get's acceptable performance in games.
>
> > >> > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > Well, the fact is, even with a single core K8 CPU, it still get's
> > >> > > > acceptable performance in games. IMO, the M11X has shown GPU is
> > >> always the
> > >> > > > first bottleneck. That's why I still have my n10j around. Yes, it's
> > >> limited
> > >> > > > by the Atom N270, but it's 9300m still allows it to game. Just as a
> > >> a
> > >> > > > general PC, it's piss-slow.
>
> > >> > > > Gaming, look at GPU over CPU. Anything else, settle for nothing 
> > >> > > > less
> > >> than:
> > >> > > > (dual cores)
> > >> > > > AMD K10.5 (Nile - the Athlon II and Phenom II mobile CPU)
> > >> > > > Intel Core series (Arrandale i3/i5/i7 and Core 2 CULV)
>
> > >> > > > NOTHING less... IMO :)
>
> > >> > > >   On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> > > >> lol, brothers, i already spnd most of my money on the wonderful
> > >> desktop of
> > >> > > >> mine..
> > >> > > >> i just need some mobile device that i can carry around and surf 
> > >> > > >> the
> > >> > > >> internet wherever i go and reply to this group. :)
> > >> > > >> yeah, i know it's a bit low budget, but im gonna make it a fully
> > >> linux
> > >> > > >> platform,sort of a MID but with keyboard..lol...
> > >> > > >> should i go for the AMD neo dual core or should i wait my 
> > >> > > >> country's
> > >> telco
> > >> > > >> 3G  data charge to drop, as i have a 3G compatible phone and can
> > >> surf. but
> > >> > > >> it's expensive rite now...:(
>
> > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Namige <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> > > >>> Might as well spend an extra $200 and get a core i3 and a better
> > >> > > >>> graphics card
>
> > >> > > >>> On Aug 4, 7:19 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > raise that to 450-550 and you get a pentium dual core at 
> > >> > > >>> > 2.0ghz+
> > >> and
> > >> > > >>> > at least a geforce g310/gt320, which already pulls its own
> > >> weight :)
>
> > >> > > >>> > On Aug 4, 6:16 pm, Namige <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > >>> > > $320 in the UK will get you an intel atom with a gma 950
> > >> netbook so
> > >> > > >>> > > not good :(
>
> > >> > > >>> > > On Aug 4, 4:24 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > around 320$ perhaps? ^^ RM 1000 in my currency though..
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:12 PM, tribaljet <
> > >> [email protected]>
> > >> > > >>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > > > How cheap you want to go?
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > On Aug 4, 3:01 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > learned something new every day in this group, lol, u
> > >> guys
> > >> > > >>> really are
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > pros..thanks ^^...CPUs was never my expertise here,
> > >> guess i
> > >> > > >>> should avoid
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > buying netbooks anytime soon...i still searching for a
> > >> nice
> > >> > > >>> mobile system
> > >> > > >>> > > > > to
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > replace my current laptop which the battery last only 
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > 10
> > >> > > >>> minutes (after
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > being revive via freezer)..
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > so, which is the cheapest that u guys can recommend me
> > >> for
> > >> > > >>> acceptable CPU
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > performance?
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:04 PM, tribaljet <
> > >> > > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > Seriously, bin atoms, bit celerons and bin neos. The
> > >> lowest
> > >> > > >>> acceptable
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > performing cpu is the "almost" core 2 duo, known as
> > >> pentium
> > >> > > >>> dual core,
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > which is something between a core duo and a core 2
> > >> duo. The
> > >> > > >>> good thing
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > about it is that it's usually paired with at least an
> > >> intel
> > >> > > >>> gm45/pm45
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > chipset. Single cores? I would only buy high clocked
> > >> dual
> > >> > > >>> core, or a
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > medium clocked quad core at least. There are good 
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > cpus
> > >> at
> > >> > > >>> good prices,
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > and as Jeremy showed, a 50$ discount usually isn't
> > >> worth the
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > processing power you lose. Being cheap with the cpu 
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > is
> > >> never
> > >> > > >>> a good
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > idea.
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > On Aug 4, 12:49 pm, "THEfog ." <
> > >> [email protected]>
> > >> > > >>> wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > @jeremy
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > Makes you wonder why huh? Intel were planning the
> > >> same
> > >> > > >>> thing
> > >> > > >>> > > > > apparently
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > for
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > their Atoms, they were originally to use the 
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > ancient
> > >> > > >>> Presscott
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > Architecture
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > but that idea was binned. They must figure that
> > >> somehow
> > >> > > >>> these older
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > processors are better for a Battery life >
> > >> Performance
> > >> > > >>> machine, they
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > mustn't
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > take into account that the time people spend 
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > waiting
> > >> for
> > >> > > >>> this slower
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > CPU's
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > roughly translates into the gain of battery life
> > >> they
> > >> > > >>> squeeze out of
> > >> > > >>> > > > > a
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > ancient architecture. I'm pretty sure that they
> > >> would be
> > >> > > >>> better off
> > >> > > >>> > > > > using
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > a
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > more modern architecture at a lower voltage.
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > THEfog
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > On 04/08/2010 9:27 PM, "Espionage724" <
> > >> > > >>> [email protected]>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > wrote:
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > Never knew that much info about CPU's even
> > >> existed... lol
> > >> > > >>> Thx ppls :)
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Jeremy Shaw <
> > >> > > >>> [email protected]>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > I agree with you on al...
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > --
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > Acer TravelMate 2480
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz
> > >> RAM: 2GB
> > >> > > >>> DDR2
> > >> > > >>> > > > > 333Mhz
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >   HDD: S...
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > Laptop:
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > Acer Aspire
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > >> > > >>> > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > --
> > >> > > >>> > > > Laptop:
> > >> > > >>> > > > Acer Aspire
> > >> > > >>> > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > >> > > >>> > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > >> > > >>> > > > Intel 945 Chipset
> > >> > > >>> > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > >> > > >>> > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > >> > > >>> > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > > >>> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > > >>> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> > > >>> --
> > >> > > >>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > >> > > >> --
> > >> > > >>  Laptop:
> > >> > > >> Acer Aspire
> > >> > > >> Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > >> > > >> Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > >> > > >> Intel 945 Chipset
> > >> > > >> 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > >> > > >> 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > >> > > >> Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
>
> > >> > > >> --
> > >> > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> --
> > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > > --
> > > Laptop:
> > > Acer Aspire
> > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> > > Intel GMA 950 IGP
> > > Intel 945 Chipset
> > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> > > 80GB standard PATA HDD
> > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04
>
> > >  --
> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to