Burnout 2 was the last Burnout made exclusively by Criterion, I bought Burnout 3 and 4 a few months ago and they definitely reek of EA :S
On Sep 11, 8:13 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > EA bought Criterion? That might explain the Burnout Most Wanted game > I've seen then lol > > > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:56 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > But since they opened the beta, even before the final version (which > > btw still says beta on their site :S) that there was a HUGE increase > > in lag, that still hasn't been fixed until now. A racing game is very > > sensitive to the slightest lag, so it was kind of a bold bet from EA > > on doing that. But honestly, after having played quite a bit of nfs > > world, I would prefer 1000x that they did a burnout online, EA bought > > Criterion so it wouldn't be any problem at all. > > > On Sep 11, 7:53 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And why do they have to peddle unefficient launchers. But then again, > >> maybe it's for the best that Blizzard to keep their proper .exe with > >> optional launchers, not mixing with that EA riff raff ;P > > >> On Sep 11, 7:48 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > lol yea, plus they have a config file, but thats not even editable lol > > >> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:46 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Lol, the fact that they only have 4 graphical settings is > >> > > laughable :)) What, kids these days can't handle a bit of custom > >> > > settings? ;) And no, I'm not asking for obscure console, command line > >> > > or config file edits, just not "pretty, pretty dumb and dumb" :S > > >> > > On Sep 11, 7:12 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> lol, well the graphics options for NFSW are somewhat questionable... I > >> > >> obviously need AA enabled at medium settings lol... thats the only > >> > >> thing keeping me at low settings. I'm positive I can run maximum > >> > >> easily, without AA > > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > although for EA to mention about older products such as the GMA900 > >> > >> > is kinda > >> > >> > hard to believe,i think it should run on GMA900 (915 chipsets) , as > >> > >> > i dont > >> > >> > think EA will ever make a mistake on releasing a high end system > >> > >> > requirements for online game as it's MMOracing also i thing the > >> > >> > graphics > >> > >> > engine will optimized after each patch to maintain lag less online > >> > >> > gameplay.. > > >> > >> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > >> > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> >> Lol, you actually read what was on that site? A 7950GTX!? :)) > >> > >> >> But they did change the system requirements, only stopped > >> > >> >> specifying > >> > >> >> brands and models. Before they said that it required at least a GMA > >> > >> >> 950, now they just speak of a SM2 compliant card: > > >> > >> >>http://help.world.needforspeed.com/cgi-bin/eausnfswo.cfg/php/enduser/... > > >> > >> >> On Sep 11, 9:49 am, ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >> > i got these from this site > >> > >> >> > :http://www.game-debate.com/games/index.php?g_id=478&game=Need%20For%2... > >> > >> >> > see at the bottom of the page before gameplay video > >> > >> >> > i dont know whether these are true or not well i am going to try > >> > >> >> > by > >> > >> >> > tommorow > > >> > >> >> > On Sep 11, 12:37 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > > Where did you get those requirements? Since the first betas > >> > >> >> > > that EA > >> > >> >> > > clearly stated that it required at least GMA950, not GMA900 > >> > >> >> > > (915 is > >> > >> >> > > the chipset) > > >> > >> >> > > On Sep 11, 5:23 am, ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> >> > > > just saw system requirements for nfs world : > >> > >> >> > > > Need for Speed World Minimum System Requirements > > >> > >> >> > > > OS: Windows XP Service Pack 2 > >> > >> >> > > > CPU: Intel P41.7 GHz (maybe 2.0GHz…) > >> > >> >> > > > RAM: 1Gb Win XP, 1.5Gb Vista > >> > >> >> > > > Video: GeForceFXor better, Radeon8500 or better, Intel > >> > >> >> > > > GMA915 or > >> > >> >> > > > better. > >> > >> >> > > > Sound: DirectX 8.1 compatible > >> > >> >> > > > HDD: 2 GB of space is required to install the game > >> > >> >> > > > Internet: 128kbit/s Cable/DSL connection > >> > >> >> > > > Video Resolution 1024×768 32 bit. > >> > >> >> > > > DirectX 9.0c > > >> > >> >> > > > has anyone tried it on intel 915??- Hide quoted text - > > >> > >> >> > > - Show quoted text - > > >> > >> >> -- > >> > >> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> > >> > -- > >> > >> > Laptop: > >> > >> > Acer Aspire > >> > >> > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > >> > >> > Intel GMA 950 IGP > >> > >> > Intel 945 Chipset > >> > >> > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > >> > >> > 80GB standard PATA HDD > >> > >> > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > >> > >> > -- > >> > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Acer TravelMate 2480 > >> > >> GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz > >> > >> HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA > > >> > > -- > >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > >> > -- > >> > Acer TravelMate 2480 > >> > GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz > >> > HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Acer TravelMate 2480 > GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz > HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
