Arguing over semantics? I said that everyone can use a x86 driver, but only x64 users can use x64 drivers. So if a x64 driver was made first, then most users wouldn't be able to use that driver. And if the point got through, then there's no use in going over that.
On Sep 15, 2:20 pm, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> wrote: > tribaljet you made a typo or just didnt read the sentence you posted. > he noticed and i corrected it, theres nothing wrong with this but if > you are going to continue argue about it please read your post about > who can be 32/64bit and our replies. thanks. > > On Sep 15, 3:00 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > lol, the 64 bit will be the same as the 32 bit version, there's nothing more > > to it, the only difference is 64 bit architecture itself is rather more > > optimized for the CPU with 64 bit enabled...but, yeah, i have dedicated > > myself to make the V1.2 Sherry optimized on both system 32 bit and 64 bit, > > but it will take time...also i have work my ass of for the project, and work > > night and day so both 64 bit and 32 bit driver will be as fast and reliable > > as it could, so the 64 bit users and 32 bit users can rock their socks off > > in gaming and productivity ^^ > > > also for the 965 users... > > i may develop a port from V1.2 Sherry to 965 chipsets ONLY if the 965 > > developers division allow me to,if cant i wont take over that division as > > from the beginning im on the 945..i believe that other 965 developers like > > MAD_BEAST and NeoDragon can make a better 965 driver than me... > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:34 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's good that you release a x64 version of V1.2, but many users won't > > > be able to use x64 drivers, and that's my only concern. But I still > > > say that most intel x64 users here don't have powerful enough hardware > > > to justify going to x64, but if they want to have fun with a less > > > usable OS, fine then, let them rock their socks off :) > > > > On Sep 15, 1:28 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > to clear things up, i WILL doing a 64 bit version soon after the 32 bit > > > > finished..i cant do any 64 bit version if the 32 bit codes still not > > > > finished..and please note that some of the 32 bit Sherry features is > > > still > > > > hard to do in 64 bit, namely the Dynamic Video Memory and Dynamic Memory > > > > Speed cant be ported to the 64 bit yet...i will still need time for 64 > > > bit > > > > drivers..as it will take a while to finish it...if u guys remembered the > > > 64 > > > > bit version of the V1.1, it takes almost 3 -4 months after the V1.1 32 > > > bit > > > > finished..but fear not, i will finish the 64 bit as it IS in my > > > > planning, > > > > but i will not promise a finish date anytime soon,..but it will be done, > > > as > > > > the users demand for 64 bit is high... > > > > > i hope that explain everything... > > > > > cheers ^^ > > > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:42 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Seriously!? A x86 user can't use x64 drivers, period. Is that so hard > > > > > to understand? And unless you have more than 4GB of ram, what's the > > > > > use for x64? People with intel igps don't have the horsepower to do > > > > > the heavy lifting that x64 OSes allow, so just stick with x86. > > > > > > On Sep 15, 12:39 pm, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > obviously he meant everyone CAN be a 32bit user, and THEN use the > > > > > > 32bit driver. I get your point tho, im waiting for the x64 too. > > > > > > > On Sep 15, 1:22 pm, Erhan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes i know how good it performs on 32bit systems. When i compare > > > > > > > counterstrike source with the old drivers, omg... :D > > > > > > > > Yes every 32 bit user can use 32 bits driver but also every 64 bit > > > > > > > user can use 64 bits driver, strange sentence ;) > > > > > > > > I switchted from a T2400 to a T7200 and 4 GB Ram, that's why I > > > > > > > switched now to x64. Thanks. > > > > > > > > On 14 Sep., 18:03, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The purpose is to be released a fully functional, stable and > > > > > > > > high > > > > > > > > performing 32 bits version, and afterwards maybe a 64 bits might > > > be > > > > > > > > done. I say maybe because it's just a hypothesis, and all 32 > > > > > > > > bits > > > > > > > > users can use a 32 bits driver, but not everyone can use a 64 > > > bits > > > > > > > > driver. > > > > > > > > > On Sep 14, 3:41 pm, Erhan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You all make me jealous with your results. Are you going to > > > release > > > > > > > > > the 64 bit drivers before the rev 3? I know you don't have a > > > > > > > > > 64 > > > bit > > > > > > > > > computer but i hope you can still work on it somehow. Thank > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > much for your work :) > > > > > > -- > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > > Laptop: > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > -- > > Laptop: > > Acer Aspire > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > Intel 945 Chipset > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
