This definitely calls for a most concentrated and thorough YAY! :D

A different inf structure can explain the performance differences
between regular 945GM users and GME/GSE users, even though there is a
noticeable performance increase, it seems like it could be much
bigger.

Rest man, you do deserve it, everyone is holding their breath until
you get back, so no worries if you get here and see a bunch of blue
people faint on the ground :))

On Sep 15, 8:52 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> i just wanted to announce something about that ^^
>
> well, after reading back some older posts here...mainly from tribaljet, Kiki
> (not a GME /GSE user but help me alot to realize the code by comparing
> them)  and other GSE / GME users..
> i might have found sothing interesting...
>
> 1st
>
> i found out that GSE and GME isnt compatible enough with the new driver
> module in V1.1 up to V1.2 Sherry rev 2 ...
> meaning the driver module igdumdx32.dll..rather than that, the GME / GSE
> must using the igdumd32.dll driver module , which is older or "stock" driver
> module..
>
> 2nd
> also i have found that the GME / GSE uses a different inf structure, which i
> have completely removed from V1.1 to V1.2 Sherry..
>
> that said, i will begin fixing it after i get some sleep...it's 4 am here
> already....and i will starting to make the rev 3 as soon i have wake up (and
> of course breakfast and bath, lol) later...so good news may coming soon for
> GME /GSE users.. ^^
>
> cheers ^^
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:31 AM, MaxiJazz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > AngelicTears, I do not want to disturb you, but please tell me when
> > will be fix for GSE 945?
>
> > --
> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> --
> Laptop:
> Acer Aspire
> Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
> Intel GMA 950 IGP
> Intel 945 Chipset
> 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
> 80GB standard PATA HDD
> Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to