Like I said, I only went to 2007 because of the new format, and from both what I've read before and what you guys are telling, seems I'll stay with 2007. MAD, LibreOffice (the new name of OpenOffice) screws the formatting of documents BAD, no one advises it.
And on a non related note, I think I found an open source windows, but I'll have to look a bit more into it... On Oct 30, 2:38 am, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > Yea, I have Office 2010. Nothing that special. The only thing > different about the interface is that the orb is replaced with a file > button lolhttp://www.redmondpie.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/office2.png > They also replaced Word Art with "Text Effects", I guess the tool is > more powerful because you can transform it to whatever you want. It's > pretty much making your own Word Art lol. > The file extension is the same with 2007 so no new changes there. > Can't really tell you anything else because I only use Word 2010 and > that was the only program part of the Office Suite I use. > > You can try taking look at > this.http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:0ipxBgy27xUJ:download.micro... > > On Oct 29, 5:38 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > After some time now, Office 2010 was launched, and I'm curious if > > anyone already tried it and noticed any visible differences between > > 2007 and 2010. I only switched to 2007 because of the non-backwards > > compatible 2007 format, and since 2010 doesn't bring that bs again, I > > might not upgrade, unless there are tremendously more powerful tools. > > > Any takers? > > > P.S.: Don't even mention Libreoffice or I might burst into laughter > > and be unable to stop it ;P Whether we like it or not, only the paid > > office suits are worth it, both in compatibility between different > > brands, as well as formatting and learning curve, given the similar > > learning paths. > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
