Damn, now you're getting me curious to try 2010 :S and it has to be the office, since readyboost really isn't optimized as it could, trust me as I used a flash device that topped usb 2.0 bandwidth. And what's that I hear about online activation?
On Oct 30, 5:15 pm, UncleFerassi <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, Office 2010 RTM loads pretty fast, actually, almost > instantaneously as a matter of fact. Well, it's either that or > ReadyBoost on my 2gb USB is fricking awesome lol. > > On Oct 30, 6:57 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, 2007 loads quite slow for me, makes me miss 2003 a lot in that > > matter. I'm still not sure, but at least 2010 also has the classic > > menu. > > > On Oct 30, 9:02 am, CHAMPION <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Is It Just Me Or Others Also Experience Speed Increase In Loading File > > > In 2010 Faster Than That 2007............. > > > > For Me File Load Faster And Access At Low Memory In 2010 & better then > > > 2007............. > > > > So I Would Say MO2010 Is better then MO2007(for me).............. > > > > On Oct 30, 5:38 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > After some time now, Office 2010 was launched, and I'm curious if > > > > anyone already tried it and noticed any visible differences between > > > > 2007 and 2010. I only switched to 2007 because of the non-backwards > > > > compatible 2007 format, and since 2010 doesn't bring that bs again, I > > > > might not upgrade, unless there are tremendously more powerful tools. > > > > > Any takers? > > > > > P.S.: Don't even mention Libreoffice or I might burst into laughter > > > > and be unable to stop it ;P Whether we like it or not, only the paid > > > > office suits are worth it, both in compatibility between different > > > > brands, as well as formatting and learning curve, given the similar > > > > learning paths. > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
