First, I don't recommend chrome. Second, I would normally recommend using the open source project where the popular software in question is based, but just like between the official bittorrent client and utorrent, they are both based on the same architecture, but utorrent solved a few severe security issues. And no, I don't recommend utorrent either, as it is only the 2nd fastest bittorrent client.
About firefox, I recommend 3.6.x and above, there is no point is using older builds like 3.5. The first thing I'll do when I install firefox 4 final is to put the tabs below the url area, there's already enough of that in chrome :SSS But what I'm really curious is if 945g/gm/gme/gms/gse users can use that directwrite feature to accelerate browsing through gpu... On Oct 30, 5:50 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > all this browser talk makes me curious about the Chromium open source > project, which is Chrome based upon...it's open source right, so wouldnt the > source code reveal the piracy thingy? and if so, would it be better to use > chromium than official chrome?... > > lol, as for the looks, i cant wait for firefox 4 to go official, in fact it > has soo much features that do convince me to change to firefox (although i > like to test every new version of browser available, literally i have too > many browser in my system) > > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:36 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh but I'm not talking about the look, which I don't really like, but > > looks is a matter of taste. Firefox has the biggest addons library of > > all browsers, you can make it do just about anything, while chrome has > > a tiny selection. google groups search could be a lot better, one > > would think that they could do something similar to google search > > engine, but looks like housing groups search in ram like they do for > > their regular search is a bit pricey. > > > On Oct 30, 4:32 pm, Dalmation <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I actually like the look of Chrome, simple and awesome :P but I stick > > > with Firefox for too long and so lazy too change, use some other > > > browsers as backups. The only cool thing of Google Groups is it's > > > awesome search function, and free too :D > > > > On Oct 30, 9:36 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, chrome is slightly faster than firefox, and hugely disclosing > > > > every single thing you do on the internet. I'll go with firefox, thank > > > > you very much. And fyi, safari and opera aren't to be taken lightly, > > > > they are quite good on their own, or you forget that chrome uses the > > > > same engine as safari? > > > > > On Oct 30, 3:17 pm, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Chrome is win, firefox is close at second and everything else is meh > > lol. > > > > > I've used chrome since day 1 and its only improved and still getting > > better > > > > > > THEfog > > > > > > On 31/10/2010 12:02 AM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Google is messing up groups a lot, I was unable to create topics and > > > > > even post regularly, now I can't edit pages in archives, which is a > > > > > bitch. SCREW YOU GOOGLE. > > > > > And chrome, would be great if not done by google. If you just go to > > > > > vanilla pages, chrome is not the worst of everything ever created > > > > > (although very close to), you have, other than firefox, safari and > > > > > opera. Fortunately there are almost as much browsers enough to > > satisfy > > > > > each one's needs. > > > > > > On Oct 30, 6:43 am, Dalmation <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > At first I thought this was a spam ... > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Laptop: > Acer Aspire > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > Intel GMA 950 IGP > Intel 945 Chipset > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > 80GB standard PATA HDD > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
