I'm beginning to worry about your eyes, guys. It's like people not seeing the difference between 60 and 80Hz refresh rate.
On 27 Dez, 18:21, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > If not being able to run UMDs is interesting then get the Go. But if > changing firmware, then it's ok. I've seen the difference between the > first three models, and 3000 interlaces the image like a mofo. The Go > has a smaller screen? A relatively big screen is one of the things PSP > has going for it, so Go is not interesting at all, besides having big > internal memory. Just get the 2000 and have everything, slap a 8-32GB > memory stick and you're all set to go. > > On 27 Dez, 18:18, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > bah i had a 3000 and never noticed that had a 2000 a long time ago and > > is nothing special, the 3000 does the same but better and the Go does > > the same of 3000 but better.... im talking from my personal > > experience, i wanted to adquire a GO beofre PSP2 was a speculation i > > was willing to pay 30-40USD per game but PSP2 changed my mind.... > > > Geting a PSP 2000 is like getting a DS lite instead of the Dsi... just > > go for the Go or dont buy anything :DDDD > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
