Well I have nothing to compare my PSP 3000 to, so I just thought the screen was normal :p
But hmm, all these arguments... idk what PSP I would go for lol, obviously 1000 series is out of the question though. And wait what do you mean the Go has no UMD? Like theres no physical drive? On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm beginning to worry about your eyes, guys. It's like people not > seeing the difference between 60 and 80Hz refresh rate. > > On 27 Dez, 18:21, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> If not being able to run UMDs is interesting then get the Go. But if >> changing firmware, then it's ok. I've seen the difference between the >> first three models, and 3000 interlaces the image like a mofo. The Go >> has a smaller screen? A relatively big screen is one of the things PSP >> has going for it, so Go is not interesting at all, besides having big >> internal memory. Just get the 2000 and have everything, slap a 8-32GB >> memory stick and you're all set to go. >> >> On 27 Dez, 18:18, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > bah i had a 3000 and never noticed that had a 2000 a long time ago and >> > is nothing special, the 3000 does the same but better and the Go does >> > the same of 3000 but better.... im talking from my personal >> > experience, i wanted to adquire a GO beofre PSP2 was a speculation i >> > was willing to pay 30-40USD per game but PSP2 changed my mind.... >> >> > Geting a PSP 2000 is like getting a DS lite instead of the Dsi... just >> > go for the Go or dont buy anything :DDDD >> >> > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
