points do relies on the system performance, the powerful the system are the more points it gets...so imo, stick with WU value, although, each WU also variable to how many steps have been calculated, so when average system process 250000 steps, but some system process 2000000 steps, it may be unfair to the person working on such massive steps...
so either way, there are some positive and negative point to each method... btw, im listed finally in the ranking!! :) although currently last place :( On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:07 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Still soon to say. While WUs (Work Units) are a fixed number (e.g.: > person x completed 4 WUs, as in 4 separate jobs), different points are > attributed to each WU. x WU can be worth 100 points, while y WU can be > worth 150, so it's still a bit relative. Not even taking in account > different clients, as well as even different configs on the same > client, which yield different values, despite all being accounted for > on our team. > > On 3 Jan, 03:51, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > oh i am a proud beast my kids are working hard for such a beautiful > > cause :) > > > > im really happy to see the list growing and growing i just hope it > > wont stop geting bigger anf bigger... > > > > you guys have any idea whats the difference between SCORE vs WUs? > > > > because based on that we could apply what we have been talking on the > > FB channel you know :D > > > > crdits based on SCORE or WUs????? > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
