I'd also like folders to take a look at the team members, and see how different is the performance of a desktop (UncleFerassi) compared to tiny laptops (the rest, so far)
On 3 Jan, 08:20, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > points do relies on the system performance, the powerful the system are the > more points it gets...so imo, stick with WU value, although, each WU also > variable to how many steps have been calculated, so when average system > process 250000 steps, but some system process 2000000 steps, it may be > unfair to the person working on such massive steps... > > so either way, there are some positive and negative point to each method... > > btw, im listed finally in the ranking!! :) although currently last place :( > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:07 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Still soon to say. While WUs (Work Units) are a fixed number (e.g.: > > person x completed 4 WUs, as in 4 separate jobs), different points are > > attributed to each WU. x WU can be worth 100 points, while y WU can be > > worth 150, so it's still a bit relative. Not even taking in account > > different clients, as well as even different configs on the same > > client, which yield different values, despite all being accounted for > > on our team. > > > On 3 Jan, 03:51, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > oh i am a proud beast my kids are working hard for such a beautiful > > > cause :) > > > > im really happy to see the list growing and growing i just hope it > > > wont stop geting bigger anf bigger... > > > > you guys have any idea whats the difference between SCORE vs WUs? > > > > because based on that we could apply what we have been talking on the > > > FB channel you know :D > > > > crdits based on SCORE or WUs????? > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
