Exactly, there is no point in playing Crysis except for it's amazing graphics, and exceptional physics. The game itself is incredibly boring, and I would rather play Nethack or DoomRL than play Crysis on an Intel GPU.
On Jan 3, 4:19 am, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> wrote: > even if you dumb down the game to its core and eliminate the whole > point one would play it for (beautiful graphics), you can't get a > decent fps on our chipset. > Well i know decent fps is subjective and i will never make my point > about it, so i guess i won't even try. > Good luck with those games and have fun playing them. > > On Jan 3, 2:22 am, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Agreed. But theres no Crysis for Xbox or PS3 and I wanna play the > > first one not the second :P > > > On Jan 2, 7:21 am, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > omfg if u want to play crysis or farcry 2 u HAVE TO get a decent > > > computer. End of story. Driver innovation is one thing but there are > > > limitations. > > > > On Jan 2, 2:18 pm, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > BTW If anyone of you has Crysis for GMA 950 or X3100 > > > > > Use this config:http://www.mediafire.com/?myexmmyzjzn > > > > > PS: Graphic's horrible btw. > > > > > On Jan 1, 11:01 pm, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > IT DOSENT MATTER SON! > > > > > > USE IGRM anyway no matter waht shader model it uses USE IGRM always > > > > > and AVALON -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
