Same here, I'd only use/recommend Crysis as a benchmark lol As for Crysis 2 and consoles, it's gonna look like crap compared to the PC version aparantly (someone somewhere linked some video showing the differences, I'm sure you know who you are :p)
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Derp <[email protected]> wrote: > Exactly, there is no point in playing Crysis except for it's amazing > graphics, and exceptional physics. The game itself is incredibly > boring, and I would rather play Nethack or DoomRL than play Crysis on > an Intel GPU. > > On Jan 3, 4:19 am, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> > wrote: >> even if you dumb down the game to its core and eliminate the whole >> point one would play it for (beautiful graphics), you can't get a >> decent fps on our chipset. >> Well i know decent fps is subjective and i will never make my point >> about it, so i guess i won't even try. >> Good luck with those games and have fun playing them. >> >> On Jan 3, 2:22 am, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Agreed. But theres no Crysis for Xbox or PS3 and I wanna play the >> > first one not the second :P >> >> > On Jan 2, 7:21 am, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> > > omfg if u want to play crysis or farcry 2 u HAVE TO get a decent >> > > computer. End of story. Driver innovation is one thing but there are >> > > limitations. >> >> > > On Jan 2, 2:18 pm, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > BTW If anyone of you has Crysis for GMA 950 or X3100 >> >> > > > Use this config:http://www.mediafire.com/?myexmmyzjzn >> >> > > > PS: Graphic's horrible btw. >> >> > > > On Jan 1, 11:01 pm, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > IT DOSENT MATTER SON! >> >> > > > > USE IGRM anyway no matter waht shader model it uses USE IGRM always >> > > > > and AVALON > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
