Alright then, I'll wait for Mad_Beast to check this thread, see what
he thinks. However, ain't really scared whatsover to release ;)

On Jan 8, 1:03 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> lol, yeah, both MSI (currently MSI-X support for Sherry 1.2) and
> fixedsegments do really gives me the headache starting from the V1.1..lol...
> but yeah, i am interested and approving it for modding :) u can send me the
> inf for further notes..as not all function of the 965 can work on the 945...
> although u may want to consult MAD_BEAST about public releasing...i my self
> have been prevented so i would not take any chances in case those intel
> bastards come knowking my door :(
> which is bad coz it's blocking my passion to my projects...
>
> currently im working on making a full from scratch driver continuing what
> Sherry 1.2 should be... :( and that my friend is very1000x time consuming
> but i may do more productivity since i have finished my exams :)
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:11 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, what I added was pretty much only the device ID with all
> > required install step it needs in order to function, within the .inf
> > file, thats pretty much it. I'm thinking about checking wether or not
> > it perform betters with/without fixedsegments and MSI too. That, my
> > friend, you'll be the first to know the results, I know you've been
> > working on those both for the project.
>
> > Already tried the downscaler too, not working good with my monitor
> > heh ;)
>
> > On Jan 7, 7:08 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > im not agree with it! u said im fucked?!
>
> > > haha, joke...
>
> > > it is good though u can actually make it work outside it's default driver
> > > purpose,.showing the driver's flexibility itselfs....although ive heard
> > many
> > > users who have success by just adding their device id, in curious , what
> > > else that ure added into the driver? as i believe with proper modding,
> > > Sherry driver would perform much better on the 956 in terms of code
> > > flexibility and execution... :)
>
> > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:46 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hey guys, what's up?
> > > > It's been a while that we've released Sigma 3.0, and I'm here to get
> > > > you guys a nice "breeze of fresh air". The news is , for about a week
> > > > now, I've managed to add the necessary stuff in the Sherry package to
> > > > be able to run it with our beloved 965.
> > > > However :
>
> > > > 1. It has been only tested on my own personal laptop.
>
> > > > 2. Even tho you might have a 965 chipset , there is still "variant" ,
> > > > therefore different DeviceID might be needed for it to work.
>
> > > > 3. Beside the little support you will get from this thread, there
> > > > won't be any support to people using Sherry Drivers with 965/x3100 in
> > > > case of bugs and whatnot.
>
> > > > 4. AngelicTears must approved for me to release any information on
> > > > this, it is afterall HIS project.
>
> > > > 5. All Thanks, hugs, rewards, dead birds to be directed towards
> > > > AngelicTears as it is his own work, I'm only showing  you how to make
> > > > it work outside the drivers purposes.
>
> > > > 6. You'll need a brain. I'll be only showing you how to do it
> > > > yourself.
>
> > > > 7. If you don't agree with the above, we'll pal, you're fucked.
>
> > > > That is all! Stay tuned for more !!
>
> > > > --
> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> > --
> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to