lol..lucky for u...i myself as a student do have some issues with that kind of matter...the thing that really scares me is infact i dont have a stable income yet making it somewhat hard to solve anything if something goes wrong :)
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:14 AM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > Alright then, I'll wait for Mad_Beast to check this thread, see what > he thinks. However, ain't really scared whatsover to release ;) > > On Jan 8, 1:03 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > lol, yeah, both MSI (currently MSI-X support for Sherry 1.2) and > > fixedsegments do really gives me the headache starting from the > V1.1..lol... > > but yeah, i am interested and approving it for modding :) u can send me > the > > inf for further notes..as not all function of the 965 can work on the > 945... > > although u may want to consult MAD_BEAST about public releasing...i my > self > > have been prevented so i would not take any chances in case those intel > > bastards come knowking my door :( > > which is bad coz it's blocking my passion to my projects... > > > > currently im working on making a full from scratch driver continuing what > > Sherry 1.2 should be... :( and that my friend is very1000x time consuming > > but i may do more productivity since i have finished my exams :) > > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:11 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, what I added was pretty much only the device ID with all > > > required install step it needs in order to function, within the .inf > > > file, thats pretty much it. I'm thinking about checking wether or not > > > it perform betters with/without fixedsegments and MSI too. That, my > > > friend, you'll be the first to know the results, I know you've been > > > working on those both for the project. > > > > > Already tried the downscaler too, not working good with my monitor > > > heh ;) > > > > > On Jan 7, 7:08 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > im not agree with it! u said im fucked?! > > > > > > haha, joke... > > > > > > it is good though u can actually make it work outside it's default > driver > > > > purpose,.showing the driver's flexibility itselfs....although ive > heard > > > many > > > > users who have success by just adding their device id, in curious , > what > > > > else that ure added into the driver? as i believe with proper > modding, > > > > Sherry driver would perform much better on the 956 in terms of code > > > > flexibility and execution... :) > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:46 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hey guys, what's up? > > > > > It's been a while that we've released Sigma 3.0, and I'm here to > get > > > > > you guys a nice "breeze of fresh air". The news is , for about a > week > > > > > now, I've managed to add the necessary stuff in the Sherry package > to > > > > > be able to run it with our beloved 965. > > > > > However : > > > > > > > 1. It has been only tested on my own personal laptop. > > > > > > > 2. Even tho you might have a 965 chipset , there is still "variant" > , > > > > > therefore different DeviceID might be needed for it to work. > > > > > > > 3. Beside the little support you will get from this thread, there > > > > > won't be any support to people using Sherry Drivers with 965/x3100 > in > > > > > case of bugs and whatnot. > > > > > > > 4. AngelicTears must approved for me to release any information on > > > > > this, it is afterall HIS project. > > > > > > > 5. All Thanks, hugs, rewards, dead birds to be directed towards > > > > > AngelicTears as it is his own work, I'm only showing you how to > make > > > > > it work outside the drivers purposes. > > > > > > > 6. You'll need a brain. I'll be only showing you how to do it > > > > > yourself. > > > > > > > 7. If you don't agree with the above, we'll pal, you're fucked. > > > > > > > That is all! Stay tuned for more !! > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
