windows vista and 7 use more resources then XP. Plus with windows vista and 7 having an extra thing involved with graphics (something to do with WDDM), it takes even more resources (and on a low-end machine, this is why FPS can be significantly lowered).
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Abhishek Indoria < [email protected]> wrote: > I don't understand WTF is WoW's problem with running in W7 and Vista. > Shouldn't it be throwing up more fps because they are more advanced!?!? > Weird. I think this is the same situation(almost) as BF2 not running on > GMA950 and BF2142 running fine lol. > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Not toooo sure. >> >> With a 1.6Ghz Single core Celeron, 2GB RAM, 950GMA and Windows 7, I >> couldn't get above 20FPS mostly anywhere with lowest settings, however XP >> had me going 30FPS+ in most places. >> >> With a 4500m, I'd imagine better performance, but idk. Depends on what >> your CPU is.\ >> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:59 PM, ThaGaimz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> One more thing, would it run on a 4500m(Not HD) with the same specs? >>> >>> -- >>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >>> >> >> -- >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
