i kno about the graphics 3100 and 950. i didn't argue for it or your system req notes. i jus reacted for your saying that "this thread is even more suspicious" relating my thread to some cod nonsense. i didn't wanna hurt u in particular. sorry if i did. so let's put it down.hav a nice day... 4get abt it. On Mar 16, 4:11 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > First of all, the suspicious remark wasn't for you. > Second, 640x480 looks alright on CRT monitors, not LCDs with default > maximum resolution also being the recommended by manufacturers, which > is easily understandable. > I've tried probably every single stable release of PCSX2, with the > exception of the latest beta, since it is a significant improvement. > > Mixing similar named Intel igps is very common, but has put users in > trouble due to drivers being made for a group of chipsets, in which > some exceptions had a very similar name but either were mobile/desktop > version, or just weren't natively supported. > > And since you responded so swiftly to something that wasn't even > directed at you, I'm not here to show off you say, I'm merely > contributing to inform users of simple straight facts. > > PCSX2 recommended specs ARE those that I've wrote. Don't believe me? > Check it yourself. > About the speedhacks you've used, since I haven't tested Bully yet, > I'll take your word for it. > > You might not be aware that GMA X3100 is a different chipset, the > version the came after GMA 950. GMA 3100 on the other hand is > basically the same as GMA 950, so performance differences are very > small. > > Now relax, ok? > > On 16 Mar, 10:56, hrsh91 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > as if you've got one big hell of a system to play with?? huh tribal??? > > this community is there to promote some info about games dat work > > playable with our super de-accelerator one of the worst gfx cards. so > > u should expect poor gfx. 640x480 doesn't look ugly. and i dono wat > > are u talking about this suspicious bullshit whatever!! hell wid your > > doubts> and u think u r sarcastic, then fine come up wid your ideas, > > but not wid your freaking unwitnessed eyes into making others > > believing dat d info i've provided is crap. try it yourself first then > > pass on your opinion. how can u say something widout testing??? i've > > tested it. and i kno wat i'm doing dont freaking show off. > > > On Mar 15, 8:37 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > First, GMA 3100 (desktop) is the equivalent of GMA 950 with basically > > > the same performance. Second, 1GB of meemory for running PCSX2 is a > > > very little amount, 2GB is the absolute minimum. > > > Using a few speedhacks help, as long as it doesn't fully break the > > > game's graphics, and using resolutions lower than 640x480 is a joke in > > > today's computing, after all mobile devices have higher resolution. > > > > People have to remember that even dedicated gpus on quad core machines > > > have issues running PCSX2, also because the PS2 itself is a rather > > > hard system to emulate. > > > > Also, I've noticed that that suspicious character that was talking > > > nonsense about CoD is here, so this thread is even more suspicious. > > > > Anyway BigHead, I'm not trying to put you down, I'm only saying that > > > the PCSX2 community recommended specs are 2GB+ of memory, a quad core > > > CPU, and a 9800GTX. So that whatever conclusions you can from that. > > > Though I hope things improve further like they did from v0.9.4 to > > > 0.9.7. > > > > On 15 Mar, 11:08, hrsh91 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > not sure about that. as long as you keep the renderer as hardware, > > > > it'll use your gfx card only, n 1gb ram is also not bad, but having > > > > more ram really helps in getting more fps.i think yours might run it a > > > > little slow but not much, bcoz u have a 3100. and dont 4get the 1.2 > > > > angelic's modded drivers. without dat d game runs like shit... > > > > > On Mar 15, 11:30 am, BigHead <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hêy man,i have a question.My Spes is : > > > > > Ram : 1GB :( > > > > > Intel Dual Core 2.2ghz E2200 > > > > > Intel GMA 3100 > > > > > Windows Seven Home Premium > > > > > i wonder that i only have 1GB of ram,will bully run smooth with 1GB > > > > > ram ? > > > > > > On 14 Tháng Ba, 15:44, hrsh91 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > hey!! i'm new to this group. I've made this game bully (ps2 version) > > > > > > run on pcsx2 using my intel gma 950. so its a brilliant game. people > > > > > > plz i beg u to play it!!!. just go to youtube and check the video > > > > > > i've > > > > > > uploaded. name rodeo 31 jus type "bully on intel 950 gma(ps2 > > > > > > version), > > > > > > i've provided the settings also. i got an fps of 25 to 30(very much > > > > > > playable!!!), i'm trying other games now on pcsx2 > > > > > > specs:- > > > > > > intel dual core 2gh e2180 > > > > > > 2gb transcend ddr2 ram. > > > > > > intel 950 gma onboard gfx > > > > > > 250 gb hard drive. > >
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
