I don't have VT. Any chance it'd still run playably virtualized? That seems like an alien thing to me...
Also, how is game performance on Linux? On Apr 3, 12:11 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Stalker is one of those oddity games that actually run better on xp. I > strongly recommend win7 for every single thing, but it has been proven > that that specific games does run acceptably on xp and not really > playable on win7. Either dual boot or virtualize xp, your specs are > enough to run that game quite acceptably. > > On 3 Abr, 02:35, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > whoops, forgot, I'm also on a X3100/Intel 965. > > > On Apr 2, 9:33 pm, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have a 1.66ghz C2D, 2gb RAM, and Win7 Ultimate. I'm using the Sigma > > > 3 drivers. For some reason, I'm getting an astoundingly low framerate, > > > getting really, really close to an unplayable one. Any help? I've used > > > Avalon.reg (though I don't think it does anything: setting > > > disablehwacceleration should have a drastic affect and has none), igrm > > > isn't needed as it's already set to software by default though I've > > > toggled it and gotten worse with hardware, and my hard drive's > > > defragmented. Any tips? > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
