The winds of time carry many wonders my friend. :) Unfortunately, I don't have access to my old 945GM anymore. My dad has been using it as a low cost terminal for some of his work, and I have yet to get a copy of Crysis or Crysis 2. I'd gladly try it's performance on this X3100 (965GM) though. :D
@Espionage724: Surprisingly many of them are versatile gamers, provided they stick to comfortable input settings. Like my friends always use the lowest sensitivity for their mouse in CounterStrike and the likes, but I often go with higher sensitivity. I always tell myself its for responding faster to surprise attacks (and I'm better at assault tactics at that :P), but its really all just personal preferrence at the end of the day. On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, hrsh91 <[email protected]> wrote: > i completed this game and crysis warhead a year back from now. its > wasn't playable from the last 2 levels but almost 75% of the gaming > levels were playable in lowest setting without low configs or ultra > low config. and i've already posted that crysis 2 does not work. > > On Apr 14, 6:42 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > One of the biggest things I laugh about is how people who play on > consoles > > wonder how it is even possible to play a first-person shooter on a > > computer.... > > > > But I guess when your used to massive aim-assist and limited controls of > > some console FPS's, I guess trying a fast-paced game like Unreal > Tournament > > of Quake on the PC would render you useless :p > > > > But one thing that consoles have that's better is less hackers (aim > botters > > and etc) but thats about it. > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Jaime Honrado <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > Mind you, consoles are overrated. They're just hyped up PCs put in > blackbox > > > cases and sold as magic toys for children, with the marketting slogan > "You > > > can't play this on a PC!". Open your eyes and ears to the guys in this > forum > > > and maybe you'll learn a thing or two. I sure am! > > > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Vek892 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Crysis 2 will not run on an Intel 950 GMA because it requires Vertex > > >> AND Pixel Shader 3.0 support. It would be cool if it could run, I am > > >> even saying if people prove me wrong by getting it to run (with posted > > >> PC/Laptop Specs) then I may buy it as well. Even on the Xbox 360 it > > >> lagged a bit (few bugs here and there). > > > > >> On Apr 13, 10:07 am, "Jose Villegas (MADBEAST)" > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I might be crazy, but from the facts there is a BIG chance to run > > >> > crysis on 945. > > > > >> > Crysis 1 was the heaviest and hardest game to run from the crysis > > >> > series (Crysis, C. Warhead, Crysis 2) and the 945 was capable of > > >> > running it, in a very impressive way i have to say around 20 FPS on > > >> > lowest settings and it was a LONF TIME AGO and not to mention i the > > >> > video was recorded with FRAPS, today we are more prepared to face > > >> > these challenges, Crytek 3 is a different engine... but who knows it > > >> > could be possible to run it. > > > > >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEqz9ZmQl4M > > > > >> > This video MENTALLY uploaded is PURE MAGIC my brothers... the > heaviest > > >> > game commercially known is playable on the 945, what else you need > as > > >> > testimony of Soldiers sans frontiers? > > > > >> -- > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Jaime Luis E. Honrado BS Computer Engineering Ateneo De Manila University Communications Director 2010-Present Department of Student Welfare Services Promotions and Publications (Web Team) 2010-, Member 2008-Present Ateneo Electronics and Computer Engineering Society Microsoft Student Partner 2010-Present -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
