about the 4gb on x86 thingy, i tested one on my desktop, and, well i
surprised to say that im able to use all my 4gb compared to only
3.25gb..which is a big 785mb increased...

its a full auto patch but im sertain it adds some bootflag coz it result in
2 entries on my boot menu...1 says Win 7 x86 >128GB support...and the other
says the normal win7 entry...

i was like what? 128GB?

then they were a watermark shown up saying "test mode, windows 7 7600"....
again i tested real performance test such as games, crysis run a lot better,
less stuttering of course, also other games and virtual basic express (i
used to run a bunch of those with my assignment and V1.3 codes) around 12
running windows, and it still is very stable....if anyone wants, i uploaded
it into my mediafire...

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:53 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:

> Like THEfog said, there are way, perfectly legal ways to increase the
> available memory on x86 OSes. There has been reports of systems using
> up to 5GB on a x86 system, but that's far from recommended, as like
> you said it does introduce instability. But increasing it just enough
> to use 4GB does not, specially since there is around 250MB reserved to
> avoid said instability.
>
> And THEfog, if you're talking about a windows license that came with a
> laptop, that can't be legitimaly used to switch to x64, only if you
> bought a retail version of windows, full box, manuals and both
> editions that came with.
>
> On 15 Abr, 10:00, Jaime Honrado <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @tribaljet: I'm sorry Bro. There's no way you can extend the memory you
> can
> > use on an x86 OS. It's more of a mathematical issue with the
> implementation
> > of the kernel, and modifying the kernel is akin to changing the OS
> > altogether, and will cause system instability. Not to mention the legal
> > issues you'll face if you happen to successfully mod it.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Jaime Honrado <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > @Jose: Bro, I'm really sorry. I never intended for anything bad to
> 9xxssf.
> > > On a sidenote, I just realized I'm using Sigma 3.0 beta for x64. So far
> its
> > > been treating me real good. Better than the stock from HP (I'm on a
> 6730b
> > > machine). :)
> >
> > > @Zentradis: Correct me if I'm wrong but here's how I understood your
> > > question: You want to switch to a 64bit Win7 without using a new CD
> Key. The
> > > short answer to your question is: I'm not sure.
> > > The long answer to your question is:
> > > Each OS product key you register to MS is locked to your chipset,
> > > specifically to your board. So you can switch processors or whatever
> system
> > > component (e.g. RAM, and whatnot) and your product key will still work
> on
> > > that machine. I can assure you this. I just switched processors from a
> T7300
> > > to a T9300. But I've never tried switching from 32bit to 64bit using
> the
> > > same product key.
> >
> > > Here's one thing I'd like to share though: I had a friend who used his
> > > license from a 32bit on a 64bit install. It worked. But here's the
> > > disclaimer: He used an academic license, and the key was not yet
> registered
> > > to his first 32bit installation.
> >
> > > If you really want to try it back up your data first! And do it when
> you
> > > have the most free time. It takes a while to load your programs and
> > > preferrences back after a fresh install.
> >
> > > Good luck with your machine! :D
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:52 PM, THEfog . <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > >> Are you talking about the /3GB boot switch?
> >
> > >> THEfog
> >
> > >> On 15/04/2011 5:34 PM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> OEM versions don't allow license switching between x86 and x64, only
> > >> retail ones :S
> > >> If you get 4GB of memory, let us know and I'll post on how you can
> > >> extend the amount of memory recognized in Win7 x86.
> >
> > >> On 15 Abr, 08:07, Zentradis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks brothers you are always a resour...
> >
> > >>  --
> > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> --
> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to