Am 07.12.2018 um 06:49 hat Mitch Curtis geschrieben: > It's still easy in my opinion: just let windeployqt deploy what it > needs to [...] But does it really *need to*?
> [...] and you're done. Although... I've been distributing my > application as a portable executable and not through an installer, > purely out of laziness. > Are there some extra issues involving > installers that make windeployqt less convenient, or is it just the > final deployed size that you have an issue with? Some kind of gut feeling? It just seems wrong to install hundreds of superfluous files. Hey, I'm a german engineer, what do you expect ;-) But then again, maybe there *is* a good reason which I'm (and probably others are) not aware of. Nils _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
