> -----Original Message----- > From: Nils Jeisecke <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 7 December 2018 2:54 PM > To: Mitch Curtis <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: The QtQuick deployment story > > Am 07.12.2018 um 06:49 hat Mitch Curtis geschrieben: > > > It's still easy in my opinion: just let windeployqt deploy what it > > needs to [...] > But does it really *need to*? > > > [...] and you're done. Although... I've been distributing my > > application as a portable executable and not through an installer, > > purely out of laziness. > > > Are there some extra issues involving > > installers that make windeployqt less convenient, or is it just the > > final deployed size that you have an issue with? > Some kind of gut feeling? It just seems wrong to install hundreds of > superfluous files. Hey, I'm a german engineer, what do you expect ;-) > > But then again, maybe there *is* a good reason which I'm (and probably > others are) not aware of. > > Nils
Fair enough, I was just curious if it was purely about the file size or if there were other issues. :) I have an appalling Internet connection and support three platforms, so I agree that it should deploy as little as possible! _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
