On 20/04/12 11:28, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 20.04.2012, 02:13, "Nikos Chantziaras"<[email protected]>: >> On 20/04/12 00:45, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: >> >>>> It described in the human interface >>>> guidelines of each platform. You can google them. >>> As I wrote already, even Apple seems to be not sure what the standard >>> should be on OS X: several applications by Apple use /different/ >>> shortcuts! >>> >>> I didn't bother to google it up, because I merely wanted to give a >>> plausible explanation why there is no such QKeySequence defined as >>> standard yet. >>> [...] >>> I meant that this is exactly an example that there seems to be no >>> common agreement what the shortcut for "fullscreen" should be, even on >>> the same platform. >> >> Every platform defines it in a clear manner. >> >> Apple says "Control+Command+F": >> http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/userexperience/conceptual/applehiguidelines/KeyboardShortcuts/KeyboardShortcuts.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40002725-SW2 >> >> Microsoft says "F11 or Alt+Enter": >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb545461.aspx >> >> KDE says "F11 or Ctrl+Shift+F": >> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Usability/HIG/Keyboard_Shortcuts >> >> Gnome says "Ctrl+F11": >> http://developer.gnome.org/hig-book/3.0/input-keyboard.html.en#standard-shortcuts > > Nevertheless, these shortcuts are configurable, at least in KDE it's easy to > change > default fullscreen shortcut. Personally I change all Ctrl+Shift+something > combinations > for actions I use to something else because I'm used to Ctrl+Shift sequence > for keyboard > layout change, and X11 prevents use of other Ctrl+Shift+something shortcuts > in this > case.
You are confusing KWin's shortcut settings with application shortcut recommendations. Also, the clash in your case is the reason why many shortcuts have alternatives (F11). _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
