Are you sure you can't specify any orientation with these angular ranges? Are you looking at all the three rotation angles in the example you gave in your bug report (i.e., the 'roll' angle might be 180 for your cases when you are expecting the pitch angles to be greater than 90)? Android orientation has one angle that only has a range of 180 (-90 to 90) degrees too (same as QRotationReading <http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qrotationreading.html> ).:
See the Sensor.TYPE_ORIENTATION on this page: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/SensorEvent.html#values On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-66168 > > > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 at 1:48 AM > > From: "Alex Blasche" <alexander.blas...@qt.io> > > To: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com> > > Cc: "interestqt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org> > > Subject: RE: [Interest] QML Rotation sensor readings [images] > > > > > It seems that Qt's implementation does not possess the full range of > reading > > > that it should, since both mobile platforms support greater (and > necessary > > > values) beyond a quarter circle. > > > > Could you please file bugs for the issues you found? It's the only way > there is the chance to get this fixed. It is the only way to guarantee the > attention of the relevant developer. Thank you. > > > > -- > > Alex > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
