On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 03:06, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > > 19.02.2020, 10:53, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > > On Tuesday, 18 February 2020 16:29:13 PST Sze Howe Koh wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 08:05, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > > > > wrote: > >> > There's no good solution for using qtwebkit. You have to stop using it.
This isn't actually a solution though -- the web engine alternative is still missing a LOT of critical functionality which is exposed by qt webkit. An example: qtwebkit allows rendering of HTML content direct to a QPainter surface, keeping text as text objects and other components as vectors. This isn't possible in the webengine classes, at best you can render a rasterized image of a page to a painter. Without this capability it's impossible in Qt to render HTML content to SVG or PDF files without loss of quality. Nyall _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
