Hi, Sorry for possible misunderstanding, but i think, that original question was little different. Question was:
There is company, where are two developer groups: Group1: Use QtCreator and works with QT libraries (and works with other code which not use QT libraries). All users have Commercial License. Group2: Would like to use QtCreator and not use QT libraries (they working only with QT unrelated code). The want use QtCreator only as IDE Can both groups use QtCreator? I thought, that using QtCreator as IDE is not conditioned with having QT Commercial license. Or am I wrong? Tom pá 27. 3. 2020 v 14:51 odesílatel Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io> napsal: > > > Hi, > > > > The question was related to mixing open-source and commercial version of > Qt in the same project. See Qt licensing FAQ: https://www.qt.io/faq/ > > > > It states in question 2.7.: ”Q: Can some developers in our team working > on the same project use open-source version of Qt and some developers use > Commercial version of Qt? > > A. No. Each developer must have their own assigned Qt license. Mixing Qt > commercial licenses with Qt open-source licenses in one project/product is > not permitted.” > > > > Qt Creator under GPL license can be used for developing closed software. > The restriction about mixing commercial and open-source Qt affects the case > originally asked. > > > > Yours, > > > > Tuukka > > > > > > *From: *Jakub Narolewski <izow...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Friday 27. March 2020 at 15.27 > *To: *Jérôme Godbout <godbo...@amotus.ca>, Tuukka Turunen < > tuukka.turu...@qt.io>, Vyacheslav Lanovets <s...@lanovets.ru>, " > interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org> > *Subject: *RE: Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt > Commercial developers > > > > Maybe I misunderstood something so just correct me. > > If I use – commercially – QtCreator as my daily IDE without using Qt > library or attached modules, I still need to pay for full Qt license? > > > > Cheers, > > Jakub Narolewski > > > > *From: *Jérôme Godbout <godbo...@amotus.ca> > *Sent: *27 March 2020 14:22 > *To: *Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io>; Vyacheslav Lanovets > <s...@lanovets.ru>; interest@qt-project.org > *Subject: *Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt > Commercial developers > > > > Hi, > > > > is it just me or this is heading into the wrong way, or at least into the > opposite direction of the market. Most IDE are now free, even the embedded > world start giving IDE away: > > xCode is free > > vs code is free > > Atollic is free > > STM32 TrueStudio is free > > .. > > > > People are leaving pricy IDE behind, Keil anyone? less and less used. > Starting to pay for an IDE like QtCreator, seem like you will only get less > users toward Qt or people might be temped more and more to use VisualStudio > as an IDE of choice. > > > > This is my personnal point of view on the subject, > > My 2 cents, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Interest <interest-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Tuukka > Turunen > > Sent: March 27, 2020 8:56 AM > > To: Vyacheslav Lanovets <s...@lanovets.ru>; interest@qt-project.org > > Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt > Commercial developers > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Correct. All users need to have commercial license. It is not allowed for > part of the team to use commercial and part use open-source. Even though Qt > Creator is great, it can feel odd to pay for full Qt license and only use > the Creator IDE. > > > > We have been thinking about selling Qt Creator separately, but so far no > decisions made on this. > > > > Yours, > > > > Tuukka > > > > On 25.3.2020, 21.09, "Interest on behalf of Vyacheslav Lanovets" < > interest-boun...@qt-project.org on behalf of s...@lanovets.ru> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Situation. > > > > A company has a few developers with Qt Commercial subscription who > > write applications in Qt for iOS. > > There are many other developers, who work on other projects and don't > > use Qt libraries. > > They talk to each other and sometimes even work on the same code. > > > > Is it still possible for the developers who don't use Qt libraries in > > any way, use Qt Creator IDE for editing and debugging? > > To be on the safe side, company plans to prohibit usage of Qt Creator > > IDE for all employees. > > I reckon this is a popular solution. > > If I understand correctly, Qt even sells a special option to ban all > > company IP addresses for open-source installer. > > > > But is it really so? > > > > Regards, > > Vyacheslav > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > -- Tomas Konir Czech Republic
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest