On 3/22/21 7:25 AM, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote:
oops.
suddenly all the FUD becomes obsoleted
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:49 AM Allan Sandfeld Jensen
<k...@carewolf.com <mailto:k...@carewolf.com>> wrote:
On Montag, 22. März 2021 10:38:09 CET Roland Hughes wrote:
> On 3/22/21 4:07 AM, Bernhard Lindner wrote:
> >> Licensing FUD + death-of-perpetual-license +
death-of-OpenSource-LTS +
> >> Qt-6-rolling-out-incomplete + deleted-convenience-methods =
> >> customers-leaving
> >
> > I wonder if the loss of confidence in the current Qt owners
can ever be
> > compensated.
> >
> > Even if TQC took back their critical decisions, I can't
imagine that
> > people would ever trust them again. This could cause fatal
damage to Qt
> > in the long run if they don't sell it to someone more responsible.
>
> Dude,
>
> Comcast, TimeWarner, and all of those other set-top box vendors
formed
> an OpenSource project to create RDK so they could kick Qt to the
curb.
>
That happened 5 years ago. Comcast was only using QtWebKit from Qt
anyway.
Hmmm..
Just this year is when they flushed Qt. That's what the people working
there tell me.
The reality Vlad is that companies are dumping Qt wholesale.
Even Jason's company, you remember Jason right? QML's biggest, and
possibly __only__, fan. Even his company dumped Qt. The medical device
clients I've worked for have also dumped Qt.
It isn't the FUD that is obsolete, just the management of Qt.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
