Hi Stephan,

<http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66621> is a request to add searchAndReplace functionality to rtl::OUString, giving the following use case: "Loading strings from a resource file [...] often requires to replace certain parts of the loaded string with runtime-dependent content. For instance, a resource might contain an error message string 'The object $object$ could not be found.', where $object$ would be filled in at runtime."

Now, being the pain in the neck that I am, I wonder whether solving the above via a hypothetic

  newStr = oldStr.searchAndReplace("$object$", whatever);

would generally be useful. In general, some searchAndReplace would not work at least in the following two scenarios:

1 When there is more than one token (e.g., "$object1$",I wouldn't want to d "$object2$", ...) to replace in oldStr, and the replacements may contain text that looks like one of the tokens (but must not be replaced).

2 When there is an escape mechanism so that oldStr can contain text that looks like a token but is not replaced with a token (e.g., "\$object1$" would not expand to "\"+whatever, but to verbatim "$object1$").

IMO, a well-engineered framework to replace parts of resource strings with dynamic content would allow for both multiple tokens and an escape mechanism, so could not use the hypothetic rtl::OUString searchAndReplace.

+1


So, *is* there need for rtl::OUString searchAndReplace?

IMO, no. Especially as I think we wanted to make the OUString const anyway? AFAIK, the only method that modifies an OUString is operator+. We should think about removing that and exploit the fact that OUStrings can never change.

BTW, replacing strings in resources usually means using the tools String rather than OUString, anyway. So, this would be another argument for an external helper function that may be offered for both string types (calling a single implementation).

Although I would vote for an easy-to-use interface. The typical case is replacing one substring. For this I would like to write a single (suitably short ;-) ) line of code.

-Bjoern

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to