Hi Stephan, > Does anybody have demand for "replac[ing] a string in a string" > *outside* the area of resource strings?
That's the wrong question. If we're serious about replacing the tools-String class with the rtl-OUString, then it's ridiculous to *not* have a plain string replacement functionality (intern or extern to the class, I do not really care). Look around in our code how often String is used instead of OUString, even in newly written code. That's not only because of existing interfaces require Strings, but also because string manipulation is so much easier with the String. If we do not have such very basic operations on the OUString, then people will never accept it as replacement. That said, I'm out of this discussion (well, I try to be). I've said everything which reasonably can be said here. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
