Tre simplic: it veni del un del six ínregulari verbes:
1. *ced/er, cess-* 2. *sed/er, sess-* 3. *mov/er, mot-* 4. *ten/er, tent-* 5. *vert/er, vers-* 6. *veni/r, vent-* Am Do., 27. Aug. 2020 um 00:20 Uhr schrieb Marcos Cruz <[email protected] >: > > Yo just questionat me, pro quo "posseder" have un duesim duplic "s" in > li derivates: possession, possessiv... > > Secun li regul de Wahl, on deve vicear "d" per "s", dunc: possesion, > possesiv... > > Esque fórsan, yo pensat, in li regul it es implicit, que on vicea ne per > "s" ma per "li dur son de s"?! To vell evenir quande un vocal es ante li > "d" a vicear... > > Ma "exploder" es tot li sam casu, e on vicea "d" per un simplic "s" quam > normal: explosion, explosiv... > > Alquí save li rason de ti diferentie (ínregularitá) de "posseder"? > > Esque hay altri casus simil? > > -- > Marcos Cruz > http://alinome.net > > > -- > ne.alinome.net > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#267): https://groups.io/g/interlingue/message/267 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76430748/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/interlingue/leave/5161842/2010256328/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
