Yo just questionat me, pro quo "posseder" have un duesim duplic "s" in li derivates: possession, possessiv...
Secun li regul de Wahl, on deve vicear "d" per "s", dunc: possesion, possesiv... Esque fórsan, yo pensat, in li regul it es implicit, que on vicea ne per "s" ma per "li dur son de s"?! To vell evenir quande un vocal es ante li "d" a vicear... Ma "exploder" es tot li sam casu, e on vicea "d" per un simplic "s" quam normal: explosion, explosiv... Alquí save li rason de ti diferentie (ínregularitá) de "posseder"? Esque hay altri casus simil? -- Marcos Cruz http://alinome.net -- ne.alinome.net -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#266): https://groups.io/g/interlingue/message/266 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76430748/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/interlingue/leave/5161842/2010256328/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
