On May 30, 2005, at 6:13 AM, Jakob Peterh�nsel wrote:
Hi All,
Just a small query to the masters on the list, as to how you set up
your IM maps..
Do you map VLAN's, physical interfaces or both?
I'm asking because I'm thinking we have physical interfaces serving
1-n VLANs and currently there is no 'smart' way to 'sub-interface'
VLAN's on the physical interfaces in InterMapper.
It makes it hard to layout the physical wiring along with the virtual
infrastucture.
If you ask a Cisco switch via SNMP you can get the VLAN's active on a
given physical interface, so would it make sence for InterMapper to
automatically sub-interface VLANs active on a given physical interface
this way?
I am looking at mapping switch port's to VLAN's and propagating the IP
subnets appropriately in a near future release. On non-trunk ports,
there is only one VLAN per physical interface. I'm not sure how we're
going to handle the trunk ports yet.
If you are interested in helping us to improve support for switches,
please make sure you are subscribed to Giant-Snappy tester's list.
Regards,
Bill Fisher
Dartware, LLC
____________________________________________________________________
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
