Hi, Sounds great!
I'm on that list.. ;-)
Jakob Peterh�nsel
"Tell me why, don't we try, not to break our hearts
and make it so hard for our selfs"
P.S.B. 1987
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: Marook
Phone: +45 22684961
On 01/06/2005, at 23:51, William W. Fisher wrote:
On May 30, 2005, at 6:13 AM, Jakob Peterh�nsel wrote:Hi All,Just a small query to the masters on the list, as to how you set up your IM maps..Do you map VLAN's, physical interfaces or both?I'm asking because I'm thinking we have physical interfaces serving 1-n VLANs and currently there is no 'smart' way to 'sub- interface' VLAN's on the physical interfaces in InterMapper.It makes it hard to layout the physical wiring along with the virtual infrastucture. If you ask a Cisco switch via SNMP you can get the VLAN's active on a given physical interface, so would it make sence for InterMapper to automatically sub-interface VLANs active on a given physical interface this way?I am looking at mapping switch port's to VLAN's and propagating the IP subnets appropriately in a near future release. On non-trunk ports, there is only one VLAN per physical interface. I'm not sure how we're going to handle the trunk ports yet.If you are interested in helping us to improve support for switches, please make sure you are subscribed to Giant-Snappy tester's list.Regards, Bill Fisher Dartware, LLC ____________________________________________________________________List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk% 40list.dartware.com/To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
