Ohh,
That sounds really stupid in my mind!
Why are we forcing a technical UNIX path structure over a Label String
Display?????
There is, as I see it, no reason at all to tell the user that you are at the
'root' of any given folder level - if there is only a map name, that's it!
If you are at a folder level, you could simply display: FolderName/Mapname.
And while we are at it, make a checkbox to it (or another label type) that
strips the folders!
As it is now, we have no way of hiding "Customers/TheStupidOnes/CustOneMapOne"
- and why should they see the folder structure we organice our maps in anyway?
;-)
--
Jakob Peterhänsel
"Be a part of the Love Generation - carry a smile, not a gun."
- JP, May 2006
AIM: Marook
Phone: +45 30787715
On 02/06/2010, at 18.03, Janice Losgar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is because you can now nest maps into folders, in the Server Settings >
> Enabled Maps window. Map Status probe labels use the Map Name as the default
> label ${PARAM:Map Name}. Since the maps can now be nested in folders and
> subfolders, map status probes display the full path to the map (/ indicates
> the map lies at the root folder in the Map List).
>
> Regards,
>
> Janice Losgar
> Dartware, LLC
> (603) 643-9600 x114
>
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2010, at 11:53 AM, kaijlh wrote:
>
>> ${PARAM:Map Name}
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> List archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
> To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]
>
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [email protected]
