On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:35, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> SH>> I believe the way it was designed was:
> SH>>
> SH>> namespace A {
> SH>> namespace A:B {
> SH>> class C {
> SH>> }
> SH>> }
> SH>> }
>
> That's the same thing. As was noted repeatedly on the lists, ':' has no
> semantic meaning, A and A:B are not related in any way.
>
> One again:
> Namespaces are not 'nested'. You can define namespace inside other
> namespace, this does not make them related. There's no namespace nesting.
> ':' in namespace name does not mean anything.
I know, its synactic sugar to give the illusion of nesting. I was just
pointing out that I believe that is how it was meant to 'look.'
-Sterling
--
"I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma"
- The Great Oz, The Wizard of Oz
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
