SH>> I believe the way it was designed was: SH>> SH>> namespace A { SH>> namespace A:B { SH>> class C { SH>> } SH>> } SH>> }
That's the same thing. As was noted repeatedly on the lists, ':' has no semantic meaning, A and A:B are not related in any way. One again: Namespaces are not 'nested'. You can define namespace inside other namespace, this does not make them related. There's no namespace nesting. ':' in namespace name does not mean anything. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.109 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php