On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Tim Parkin wrote: >> Could you please point me to the recent discussion that takes into >> account the progress of Postgres and the change in licensing of MySQL > >There isn't a discussion on that topic per say, but there are plenty on >why we do(n't) want to bundle new options with the code. Please read >those and bash them into place for this drawing board.
Perhaps the conversation has more pertinence in the current light? I have read many posts about default bundling and agree with many. However, some things get bundled, some others do not. I agree with Rasmus and Sterling regarding SQLite. I also agree than unbundling mysql is a good idea in the present circumstance (whereas previously there was no reason). It doesn't seem a cut-and-dried situation. I would just like to know what the arguments regarding the bundling of postgres are. If they've been posted before then I'll read them. > That discussion is mostly non public and will not become public until we can > find a consensus/solution togeter with MySQL on LinuxTag during july. Sorry, it appeared from what Zeev had said that this was a matter of historical record. Tim ---------------------------------------------- Tim Parkin Managing Director Pollenation Internet Ltd www.pollenation.net m : 07980 59 47 68 t : 01132 25 25 00 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
