On 15 Feb 2004 at 13:08, Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 12:04 15/02/2004, Timm Friebe wrote: > >I agree with Sterling. What if I have some really methods in my base > >class that I rely on being existant in each and every subclass of it, > >including Exception (or any other name I thought of to work around > >"Exception" being built-in)? > > Couldn't quite understand that. Can you elaborate on what you mean exactly?
I'm with Timm here. For example I could have a framework with a complex class hierarchy: CObject - base class for _all_ classes CException extends CObject - base class for all exceptions .... This is not possible since CException cannot extend both CObject and CException. In my opinion we should provide a throwable interface and an exception base class implementing that interface. Forthermore we should use a common prefix for the identifiers but that's a different topic. -- Ferdinand Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
